免疫印迹法在实验大鼠汉坦病毒监测中的应用及与间接免疫荧光法之比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

Q503

基金项目:


Western Blotting for Monitoring Hantavirus Antibodiesof Rats and Comparison with indirectImmunofluorescent Antibody
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    用汉坦病毒汉滩株(76-118)重组核蛋白作为免疫印迹法(WesternBlot以下简称WB)的诊断抗原,用于实验感染大鼠血清抗体效价测定。同时与用汉城株(SR-11)感染的Vero-E6细胞作抗原的间接免疫荧光法(以下简称IFA)进行比较。WB法对3/4标本在大鼠接种病毒后第3天测得血清IgM阳性,而IFA法仅1/4标本出现阳性,IFA效价为1:5120的血清,WB效价为1’:40960,且在血清1:10稀释时反应带亦清晰。两种方法分别测定64份大鼠血清。甩IFA法,44份(68.8%)出现类似阳性的荧光颗粒,而用WB法测定,无特异的反应带出现。非感染Vero-E6细胞作IFA抗原,30份(46.9%)与正常细胞抗原有反应,此结果表明WB法在特异性和敏感性方面均高于IFA法。IFA法中的非特异性反应系血清与细胞成份之反应。

    Abstract:

    e developed Hantaanvirus ( 76-118) recombinant nucleocapsid protein( rNP ) as an antigen for Western Blotting ( WB ) to detect the antibodyVero E6 cell by Seoul virus (SR-11 ) as an antigen.Bb WB, 3 of 4 sera,butonly 1 of 4 by IFA, showed to be IgM antibody positive at the day 3 postinfection.The sera showed antibody titer of 1 :5120 by IFA and By WB.However, the sera showed a clear pattern even which was diluted from1 : 10 to 1 : 40969. The two methods were applied as the serologicalconfirmation of Hantavirus infection in 64 laboratory rats sera.By IFA,44 of 64 sera showed a strong IFA to infected Vero cell antigen, but, noneshowed a speciffc pattern by WB method.In addition, 30 of 64 sera alsoreacted with noninfected Vero cell antigen .The results demonstrated that thesensitivty and specificity of WB was suggested hiatsher than that of IFAtest. It was considered that the nonspecific immunofluorescence was theresponse to the cellular component.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李红,吉松组子,有川二郎.免疫印迹法在实验大鼠汉坦病毒监测中的应用及与间接免疫荧光法之比较[J].中国实验动物学报,1995,(1).

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭