无菌动物无菌检测的探讨
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

浙江大学医学院附属第一医院传染病诊治国家重点实验室,国家感染性疾病临床医学研究中心, 感染性疾病诊治协同创新中心,杭州 310003

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Discussion on aseptic tests of germ-free animals
Author:
Affiliation:

State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近年来,肠道微生物在人类的健康和疾病中的应用受到了广泛关注。 无菌动物在肠道微生态中的模型应用越来越广泛,为人类的生理、病理研究提供了非常有效的研究工具。 为保证实验动物的质量,必须对无菌动物频繁的进行无菌检测。 但无菌检测受到诸多因素的干扰。 目前传统的检测方法主要是细菌、真菌培养及革兰染色镜检。 随着高通量测序的发展,现在新增了一种分子生物学检测技术(PCR),利用 16S rRNA 进行细菌的鉴定。 但这些方法都存在一定的局限性。本文将对这些方法的利弊及影响因素进行简要探讨。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, the role of intestinal microorganisms in human health and diseases has been widely researched. The application of a germ-free animal model in intestinal microecology is extensive and this model provides a very effective research tool for human physiological and pathological research. To ensure the quality of experimental animals, aseptic tests must be frequently performed. However, sterility tests are affected by many factors. At present, the traditional detection method are mainly bacterial and fungal culture and Gram staining. With the development of high- throughput sequencing, polymerase chain reaction method have been used to identify bacteria using 16S rRNA. However, these method have some limitations. In this paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these method and the influencing factors.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李永军,李兰娟.无菌动物无菌检测的探讨[J].中国实验动物学报,2021,29(1):110~115.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-03-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭