可评价注射式再生支架修复效果的小鼠骨缺损模型的构建研究
作者:
作者单位:

1. 安徽医科大学基础医学院,合肥 230032;2. 军事科学院军事医学研究院辐射医学研究所,北京 100850;3. 空军特色医学中心血液科,北京 100142;4. 军事科学院军事医学研究院实验动物中心,北京 100071


Establishment of a mouse bone defect model to evaluate the repair effect of injectable regenerative scaffolds
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Basic Medical College of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China. 2. Institute of Radiation Medicine,Military Medical College, Beijing 100850. 3. Air Force Medical Center, Hematology Department, Beijing 100142.4. Experimental Animal Center, Military Medical College, Beijing 100071

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 建立小鼠股骨缺损模型并探索甲基丙烯酰化明胶(gelatin methacryloyl,GelMA)对缺损后骨再生的影响?方法 将40 只8 周龄的雌性C57BL/6N 小鼠随机分成4 组:骨缺损组(n= 10),5% GelMA 组(n=10),10% GelMA 组(n= 10),15% GelMA 组(n= 10)?造模2 周后,使用HE 染色观察股骨组织结构;使用Masson 染色观察股骨胶原纤维形态;使用OCN 免疫组化染色分析骨特异性蛋白表达水平?结果 GelMA 具有良好的可注射性,可经PCR Pipettes 移液器注入骨缺损区?HE 染色结果表明10% GelMA 组相较于骨缺损组?5%GelMA 组和15% GelMA 组具有更好的骨修复效果,缺损部位组织结构更加完整;Masson 染色结果表明10% GelMA组有更多成骨相关的胶原纤维形成;RT?qPCR 分析显示,10% GelMA 组小鼠骨缺损部位OCN 表达显著高于骨缺损组(P< 0?? 001)?5% GelMA 组(P< 0?? 01)和15% GelMA 组(P< 0?? 01)?10% GelMA 组小鼠骨缺损部位Osterix 表达显著高于骨缺损组(P< 0?? 001)?5% GelMA 组(P< 0?? 001)和15% GelMA 组(P< 0?? 01);OCN 免疫组化染色结果表明10% GelMA 组的修复区骨特异性蛋白表达显著高于骨缺损组(P< 0?? 01)?5% GelMA 组(P< 0?? 01)和15%GelMA 组(P< 0?? 05)?结论 构建了可评价注射式再生支架修复效果的小鼠骨缺损模型,并应用于基于GelMA 的可注射再生支架筛选和治疗效果评价,为开展相关领域工作提供实验基础?

    Abstract:

    Objective To establish a mouse femoral bone defect model and explore the effect of a GelMA hydrogel on bone regeneration and repair. Methods Forty 8?week?old female C57BL/6N mice were randomly divided into four groups: bone defect group (n= 10), 5% GelMA group (n= 10), 10% GelMA group (n= 10), and 15% GelMA group (n= 10). At 2 weeks after modeling, HE staining was used to observe the femur structure. Masson staining was used to observe the morphology of femoral collagen fibers. OCN immunohistochemical staining was used to analyze bone?specific protein expression levels. Results GelMA was well injectable and injected into bone defects using PCR pipettes. HE staining showed that the 10% GelMA group had a better bone repair effect than bone defect, 5% GelMA, and 15% GelMA groups, and the tissue structure of the defect site was more complete. Masson staining showed more osteogenic collagen fibers in the 10% GelMA group. RT?qPCR analysis showed that OCN expression in the bone defect site in the 10% GelMA group was significantly higher than that in the bone defect group (P< 0?? 001), 5% GelMA group (P< 0?? 01), and 15% GelMA group (P< 0?? 01). Osterix expression in the bone defect site in the 10% GelMA group was significantly higher than that in the bone defect group (P< 0?? 001), 5% GelMA group (P< 0?? 001), and 15% GelMA group (P<0?? 01); OCN immunohistochemical staining showed that bone?specific protein expression in the repair area in the 10% GelMA group was significantly higher than that in the bone defect group (P< 0?? 01), 5% GelMA group (P< 0?? 01), and 15% GelMA group (P< 0?? 05). Conclusions A mouse bone defect model to evaluate the repair effect of injectable regenerative scaffolds was established and applied to the screening and therapeutic effect evaluation of injectable regenerative scaffolds based on GelMA, which provides an experimental basis to carrying out studies in related fields.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王飞燕,李志凌,尹博丰,李佩霖,郝瑞聪,韩梦月,李晓彤,田家仪,丁丽,武文卿,朱恒.可评价注射式再生支架修复效果的小鼠骨缺损模型的构建研究[J].中国实验动物学报,2023,31(8):985~992.

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:783
  • 下载次数: 791
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-09
文章二维码
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭