基于16S rDNA测序的中国地鼠和金黄地鼠的微生物群比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国医学科学院医学实验动物研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重大协同创新项目(2022-I2M-1-020)


Comparison of the microbiota of Chinese hamsters and golden hamsters based on 16S rDNA sequencing
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Institute of Laboratory Animals Science,CAMS &2.PUMC

Fund Project:

National Major Collaborative Innovation Project (Grant No. 2022-I2M-1-020).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】目的 本研究旨在通过16S rDNA测序技术比较中国地鼠和金黄地鼠肺部与肠道微生物群落的组成和多样性差异,为理解它们在人类疾病研究中的应用提供新的视角。方法 选取6~8周龄的SPF级中国地鼠和金黄地鼠各12只(雌雄各半),在无菌条件下采集肺泡灌洗液、小肠内容物和大肠内容物样本。通过16S rDNA测序技术进行物种注释和多样性分析,包括α多样性和β多样性分析,并使用LEfSe分析识别潜在的生物标志物。结果 α多样性分析,金黄地鼠(尤其是雄性)的肺部和小肠微生物群落多样性显著高于中国地鼠(P < 0.05),中国地鼠的大肠微生物群落的多样性显著高于金黄地鼠(P < 0.05)。β多样性分析,两种地鼠在肺部、小肠和大肠的微生物群落组成上均存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。LEfSe分析,在肺部微生物群落中,金黄地鼠的差异物种是厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)。中国地鼠差异物种是拟杆菌门(Bacteroidota)(雌性)和变形菌门(Proteobacteria)(雄性);在小肠和大肠微生物群中,中国地鼠的差异物种是厚壁菌门(Firmicutes);金黄地鼠的差异物种是拟杆菌门(Bacteroidota)。结论 中国地鼠和金黄地鼠在肺部和肠道微生物群落的组成和多样性上存在显著差异,这些差异可能与它们在人类疾病研究中的不同应用领域相关。例如,中国地鼠的厚壁菌门优势可能与其作为2型糖尿病研究模型的特性相关,而金黄地鼠的拟杆菌门优势可能影响其对新冠病毒的易感性。本研究为理解这两种地鼠在人类疾病研究中的应用提供了新的视角,并为未来通过调节微生物群落改善它们的健康状况和实验性能提供了理论基础。

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objective This study aims to compare the composition and diversity of lung and gut microbiota between Chinese hamsters and golden hamsters using 16S rDNA sequencing technology, providing a new perspective for understanding their applications in human disease research. Methods Twelve SPF-grade Chinese hamsters and twelve golden hamsters (six males and six females each) aged 6 to 8 weeks were selected. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, small intestinal contents, and large intestinal contents were collected under sterile conditions. Species annotation and diversity analysis, including α-diversity and β-diversity analyses, were performed using 16S rDNA sequencing technology. Additionally, LEfSe analysis was employed to identify potential biomarkers. Results In the α-diversity analysis, the diversity of the lung and small intestinal microbiota in golden hamsters (especially males) was significantly higher than that in Chinese hamsters (P < 0.05), while the diversity of the large intestinal microbiota in Chinese hamsters was significantly higher than that in golden hamsters (P < 0.05). In the β-diversity analysis, significant differences were observed in the composition of the lung, small intestinal, and large intestinal microbiota between the two types of hamsters (P < 0.01). LEfSe analysis revealed that in the lung microbiota, the differential species in golden hamsters were the phylum Firmicutes. In Chinese hamsters, the differential species were the phylum Bacteroidota (females) and the phylum Proteobacteria (males). In the small intestinal and large intestinal, the differential species in Chinese hamsters were the phylum Firmicutes, while in golden hamsters, the differential species were the phylum Bacteroidota. Conclusions Significant differences exist in the composition and diversity of lung and gut microbiota between Chinese hamsters and golden hamsters, which may be related to their distinct applications in human disease research. For example, the predominance of the phylum Firmicutes in Chinese hamsters may be associated with their characteristics as models for type 2 diabetes research, while the predominance of the phylum Bacteroidota in golden hamsters may influence their susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the applications of these two types of hamsters in human disease research and lays a theoretical foundation for future efforts to improve their health status and experimental performance by modulating their microbiota.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-24
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-15
  • 录用日期:2026-02-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭