基于代谢组学探讨两种慢性应激相关干眼大鼠的表型和中医证候差异
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京中医药大学;2.南京中医药大学附属医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Metabolomics-based Investigation of Phenotypic and Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Differences in Two Rat Models of Chronic Stress-related Dry Eye
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine;2.The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, Key Program, Major Research Plan)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 构建慢性不可预测轻度约束(Chronic unpredictable mild restraint,CUMR)与慢性不可预测节律干预(Chronic unpredictable rhythm disturbance,CURD)两种慢性应激相关干眼模型,比较两种模型的表型与代谢组特征以及与中医证候的关联。方法SPF健康雄性大鼠30只,分为:(1)空白组(2)CUMR组(3)CURD组,CUMR组每日施加单笼饲养+行为约束,CURD组每日施加随机节律干预。造模6周后,评估一般情况、行为学、干眼指标;HE染色观察结膜、角膜、泪腺病理变化;Elisa法检测血清5-HT、Cortisol和角膜组织TNF-α、IL-1β指标水平;UPLC-QTOF-MS技术进行血清代谢组学分析。结果(1)CUMR和CUMD组外观和行为学有显著差异。(2)模型组角膜荧光染色(CFS)显著增加,泪流量、泪膜破裂时间(BUT)显著减少,且CUMR组改变更为明显。(3)模型组角膜未见明显炎症细胞浸润、结膜杯状细胞数量显著降低、泪腺空泡化面积显著增加,且CUMR组改变更为明显。(4)模型组组间ELISA检测,CUMR组血清5-HT显著降低,Cortisol显著升高,角膜组织TNF-α、IL-1β无统计学差异。(5)血清代谢组学分析提示,CUMR和CUMD组样本中鉴定出235个差异代谢物,呈现显著的分离趋势。结论 不同的应激造模会影响大鼠代谢,从而造成不同的中医证候和干眼表型。CUMR组表现为肝郁脾虚型干眼,其病理进程可能与色氨酸代谢有关;CURD组表现为肝经郁热型干眼,其生物学基础可能涉及三羟酸循环。

    Abstract:

    Objective To establish and characterize two chronic stress-related dry eye models—chronic unpredictable mild restraint (CUMR) and chronic unpredictable rhythm disturbance (CURD)—by comparing their phenotypic presentations, metabolomic profiles, and correlations with traditional Chinese medicine syndrome patterns. Methods: Thirty healthy male SPF rats were divided into the following groups: (1) Blank control group, (2) CUMR group, and (3) CURD group. The CUMR group underwent single-cage housing combined with behavioral restraint daily, while the CURD group received random rhythm intervention daily. After six weeks of modeling, general conditions, behavioral performance, and dry eye parameters were assessed. Histopathological alterations in the conjunctiva, cornea and lacrimal gland were examined via hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Serum concentrations of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and cortisol, alongside corneal levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum metabolomic profiling was conducted using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS). Results: (1) Significant differences in appearance and behavior were observed between the CUMR and CURD groups. (2) Corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) significantly increased in the model groups, while tear volume and tear film breakup time (BUT) significantly decreased, with more pronounced changes in the CUMR group. (3) In the model group, no obvious inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the cornea. The number of conjunctival goblet cells significantly decreased in the model groups, and the area of lacrimal gland vacuolation significantly increased. (4) ELISA results showed a significant decrease in serum 5-HT and a significant increase in cortisol, while no statistically significant differences were observed in corneal tissue TNF-α and IL-1β levels. (5) Serum metabolomic analysis revealed 235 differential metabolites identified in the CUMR and CURD groups, demonstrating a significant separation trend. Conclusion: Distinct stress modeling paradigms differentially impact host metabolism, culminating in divergent TCM syndrome manifestations and dry eye phenotypes. The CUMR model exemplifies a dry eye phenotype consistent with “Liver Depression and Spleen Deficiency”, potentially mediated by perturbations in tryptophan metabolism; conversely, the CURD model aligns with “Stagnation Heat in the Liver Channel”, likely arising from disruptions in the tricarboxylic acid cycle.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-16
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-17
  • 录用日期:2026-02-06
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭