Progress in the Study of Experimental Animal Models of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,;2.Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University;3.School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;4.Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;5.Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

the “Open Competition Mechanism to Select the Best Candidates” Medical Research Fund of Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2024YJJB16)

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), one of the most severe complications of diabetes mellitus, imposes a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden on patients and healthcare systems. The development of animal models that can effectively recapitulate the pathophysiological processes of human DFU serves as a critical foundation for investigating its complex mechanisms and advancing effective intervention strategies. This paper systematically reviews the research progress of experimental animal models of DFU from a comparative medicine perspective, with a focus on comparative analysis of the advantages and limitations of different models.DFU animal models are broadly categorized into two major groups: diabetes mellitus models (including type 1 diabetes models, such as streptozotocin [STZ]-induced models; and type 2 diabetes models, including spontaneously mutated strains like db/db mice, ob/ob mice, and ZDF rats, as well as induced models such as high-fat diet combined with STZ) and ulcerative wound models (encompassing ischemic, neuropathic, infectious, and clinically symptomatic models). This review emphasizes species-specific differences in wound healing and their implications for translating research findings to clinical practice: rodents primarily rely on contraction of the subcutaneous fascia for wound closure, whereas humans depend predominantly on re-epithelialization and granulation tissue formation. Parameters including gender and age exert substantial influences on model construction and phenotypic manifestations. Looking ahead, emerging technologies—including humanized models, 3D bioprinting, and multigene-engineered animal models—are expected to provide more precise experimental platforms for basic and translational DFU research.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Related Videos

Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:August 15,2025
  • Revised:December 26,2025
  • Adopted:January 14,2026
  • Online:
  • Published:
Article QR Code