实验动物福利伦理视角下的生命科学论文撤稿情况分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

广东省生物技术研究院(广东省实验动物监测中心)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

广东省科技计划项目(2021B1212060002)。


Analysis of retracted papers on basic life sciences from the perspective of laboratory animal welfare and ethics
Author:
Affiliation:

Guangdong Provincial Biotechnology Research Institute (Guangdong Provincial Laboratory Animals Monitoring Center)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对我国基础生命科学领域因涉及实验动物福利伦理问题被撤稿的英文论文进行总结分析,为提升科研人员的实验动物福利伦理意识和加强实验动物科技伦理治理提供参考。方法 基于撤稿观察数据库(Retraction Watch Database),系统梳理2015-2024年我国研究机构在国际期刊发表的基础生命科学领域英文研究论文撤稿情况,对因涉及实验动物福利伦理问题而被撤稿的研究论文进行分析,分析内容包括撤稿论文的数量、研究机构、实验对象、撤稿论文期刊及出版商和撤稿原因等。结果 2015-2024年期间,我国基础生命科学领域涉及实验动物福利伦理问题而被撤稿英文论文82篇,撤稿时间主要集中在2022-2024年;撤稿论文研究机构主要为医疗机构(81.7%)、高等院校(18.3%),实验对象主要为小鼠(76.8%)、大鼠(17.1%);撤稿论文期刊均为被SCIE收录期刊;动物实验未能提供伦理批件是最主要的撤稿原因(61.0%);肿瘤研究实验中实验动物福利问题是最主要的动物福利问题(18.3%)。结论 为进一步提升我国实验动物福利伦理意识及审查监管力度,建议相关部门协同共管,构建“教育-审查-监管-追责”的实验动物科技伦理治理闭环。

    Abstract:

    Objective This paper analyzes the retraction of English research papers in the field of basic life sciences in China that involve violations of the welfare and ethics of laboratory animals, aiming to provide references for enhancing the awareness of laboratory animal welfare and ethics among researchers and strengthening the governance of scientific ethics in laboratory animal research. Methods Based on the Retraction Watch Database, this study systematically reviewed the English research papers in the field of basic life sciences that were authored by Chinese institutions and retracted from international journals between 2015 and 2024. The retractions related to violations of the welfare and ethics of laboratory animals were analyzed, including the number of retracted papers, research institutions, experimental subjects, journals, publishers, and retraction reasons. Results During the period from 2015 to 2024, 82 English papers in the field of basic life sciences in China were retracted related to violations of the welfare and ethics of laboratory animals, mainly concentrated between 2022 and 2024. The research institutions for the retracted papers were medical institutions (81.7%) and universities (18.3%), with the main experimental subjects being mice (76.8%) and rats (17.1%). All retracted papers were published in journals indexed by SCIE. The main retraction reason was the lack of ethical approval for animal experiments (61.0%), and animal welfare in tumor research experiments were the main animal welfare violations (18.3%). Conclusions To further enhance the awareness of laboratory animal welfare and ethics, and strengthen regulatory oversight in China, we suggested that relevant departments should cooperate in management, and build a closed-loop governance system for laboratory animal science and ethics, encompassing 'education, review, supervision, and accountability'.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-17
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-09
  • 录用日期:2026-08-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-25
  • 出版日期: