RFID电子标签在生物安全二级实验室实验动物中的应用安全性与有效性评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

上海市公共卫生临床中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

上海市科委实验动物研究领域项目(Project of Laboratory Animal Research of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission;21140900202)


Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of RFID Electronic Tags in Laboratory Animals within Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2) Laboratories
Author:
Affiliation:

Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center

Fund Project:

Project of Laboratory Animal Research of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission;21140900202

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:在生物安全二级实验室内进行电子标签的应用,并对其安全性及功能进行评价。方法:通过皮下注射的方式将电子标签RFID植入到21只小鼠体内,并对电子标签安全性进行跟踪:标记3天、21天、30天、56天、84天采集小鼠血液于抗凝管中用于血常规检测,标记3天、7天、28天采集小鼠血清进行肝功能指标(谷丙转氨酶ALT,天门冬氨酸转氨酶AST)、肾功能指标(血尿素氮UREA)检测。标记3天、7天、14天将小鼠安乐死后采集脾脏进行免疫相关T、B细胞流式检测。标记7天、28天小鼠安乐死后采集心脏、肝脏、脾脏、肺、肾脏进行病理HE染色分析。此外,对RFID的功能进行监测:未标记前(视为0天)、标记3天、7天、14天、4周、8周、12周、16周进行信号采集情况及识别灵敏度情况分析。结果:电子标签对小鼠的生理生化指标,肝肾功能并未有明显差异性影响,同时病理结果显示电子标签植入后未对小鼠组织造成明显的病理变化。在生物安全二级实验室内定时收集RFID信号,发现其负压屏蔽的系统特性并未对电子标签的灵敏度造成影响。此外,该特定实验室要求所有物资均需经过高温高压灭菌处理方可出该系统,研究发现电子标签经过高温高压后仍保持其灵敏度。结论:在生物安全二级实验室进行了电子标签的安全性、有效性评价,发现电子标签可在此特殊实验环境中正常使用,这一结果为后续电子标签在生物安全实验室的顺利应用及基于电子标签的实验动物追溯系统建立奠定基础。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To apply electronic tags (RFID) in Biosafety Level II (BSL-2) laboratories and analyze their safety and functionality. Methods: RFID tags were subcutaneously implanted into 21 mice. Tag safety was assessed longitudinally: blood samples were collected into anticoagulant tubes at 3, 21, 30, 56, and 84 days post-implantation for blood routine tests; serum samples were obtained at 3, 7, and 28 days for assessment of hepatic function (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) and renal function (urea). At 3, 7, and 14 days post-implantation, mice were humanely euthanised and spleens were harvested for flow cytometric analysis of T- and B-lymphocyte populations. At 7 and 28 days, the hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, and kidneys were collected from the mice after euthanasia for histopathological examination using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Additionally, RFID functionality was concurrently monitored: signal acquisition and recognition sensitivity were evaluated at baseline (day 0, pre-implantation) and across multiple post-implantation time points: 3 days, 7 days, 14 days; 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks.?Results: Implantation of RFID tags induced no statistically significant alterations in murine physiological or biochemical parameters, including hepatic and renal function markers. Histopathological examination revealed no notable tissue lesions attributable to tag implantation. Within the BSL-2 facility, RFID signals were reliably acquired under routine negative-pressure containment conditions, indicating that the laboratory’s environmental shielding did not impair tag sensitivity. Furthermore, as all materials exiting the BSL-2 system must undergo autoclaving (standard high-temperature, high-pressure sterilisation), the study confirmed that RFID tags retained full functional sensitivity following autoclave treatment. Conclusion: The safety and effectiveness of electronic tags were evaluated in a BSL-2 laboratory, and it was found that electronic tags can be used normally in this special experimental environment. These findings support the reliable integration of RFID technology in biosafety laboratories and provide a validated foundation for establishing RFID-based experimental animal traceability systems.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-11
  • 最后修改日期:2026-06-01
  • 录用日期:2026-07-21
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: