6 种光学透明化方法在大鼠脑组织块的透明效果比较
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 南方医科大学南方医院神经外科,广州 510515; 2. 南方医科大学第一临床医学院,广州 510515)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R-33

基金项目:

广东省省级科技计划项目(2016A020213006);国家自然科学基金(81372692);国家科技支撑计划(2014BAI04B01)


Comparison of transparent effects of six different optical clearing methods on rat brain tissues
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China. 2. First Medical School, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较6 种光学透明化方法对大鼠脑组织块的透明效果?方法 选取14 只SD 大鼠脑分别采用iDISCO?SeeDB?CUBIC?SCALEVIEW-A2?CLARITY-CUBIC?Passive-CLARITY 的方法进行透明化处理?结果 对照组PBS 透明灰度值为13.031 ± 0.586, iDISCO?SeeDB?CUBIC?SCALEVIEW-A2?CLARITY-CUBIC?passive-CLARITY 分别为6.447 ± 0.574?11.690 ± 0.909?2.318 ± 0.986?8.118 ± 1.026?8.591 ± 0.384?4.198 ± 0.182,除SeeDB 组外( P =0.185),其余各组均较PBS 组差异均有显著性( P < 0.01), CUBIC 分别与各组有显著性差异( P <0.01)?透明化处理后,iDISCO?SeeDB?CUBIC?SCALEVIEW-A2?CLARITY-CUBIC?Passive-CLARITY 面积改变分别为( - 30.02 ± 2.39)%?(19.74 ± 4.09)%?(14.7 ± 3.92)%?(10.7 ± 5.55)%?(23.01 ± 4.19)%?(66.51 ±5.68)%,各组面积改变均较iDISCO 组?Passive-CLARITY 组有显著性差异( P < 0.01)?结论 除SeeDB 外,各组方法均能达到透明效果,CUBIC 方法在大鼠脑组织块的透明效果优于其他各组,iDISCO 处理后面积缩小,而Passive-CLARITY 处理后变得膨胀?

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the transparency efficiency of six different optical clearing method on the rat brain tissues. Methods Brain tissue blocks of 14 SD rats were processed with iDISCO, SeeDB, CUBIC, SCALEVIEW-A2, CLARITY-CUBIC, Passive-CLARITY clearing method, respectively. Results The gray value of PBS group was 13.031 ±0.586, that of iDISCO, SeeDB, CUBIC, SCALEVIEW-A2, CLARITY-CUBIC, passive-CLARITY clearing were 6.447 ±0.574, 11.690 ±0.909, 2.318 ±0.986, 8.118 ±1.026, 8.591 ±0.384, 4.198 ±0.182, respectively. Except the SeeDB group ( P =0.185), the rest groups showed significant differences compared with the PBS group ( P < 0.01), and there were significant differences between CUBIC and other groups ( P < 0.01). After the clearing treatment, the changes of tissue area ratio in the iDISCO, SeeDB, CUBIC, SCALEVIEW-A2, CLARITY-CUBIC, Passive-CLARITY method were( -30.02 ±2.39)%,(19.74 ±4.09)%,(14.7 ± 3.92)%,(10.7 ± 5.55)%,(23.01 ± 4.19)%,(66.51±5.68)%, respectively. Each group showed a significant difference compared with the groups iDISCO and the Passive-CLARITY, P < 0.01. Conclusions Except the SeeDB method, all the clearing methods can achieve a transparent effect, while CUBIC is better than the other groups applied for rat brain tissues. The tissue block volume is shrunken after iDISCO clearing, and expanded after Passive-CLARITY processing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

欧毅超,冯展鹏,武广森,张源,包赟,邱炳辉,刘亚伟,漆松涛.6 种光学透明化方法在大鼠脑组织块的透明效果比较[J].中国比较医学杂志,2018,28(4):7~14.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-05-22
  • 出版日期:
自2024年1期开始,杂志参考文献改为中英文对照,具体格式要求可置下载中心查看!
关闭