Fear conditioning and shock intensity: the choice between minimizing the stress induced and reducing the number of animals used
中图分类号:

R-332

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    Many fear conditioning studies use electric shock as the aversive stimulus. The intensity of shocks varies throughout the literature. In this study, shock intensities ranging from 0 to 1.5 mA were used, and the effects on the rats assessed by both behavioural and biochemical stress parameters. Results indicated a significant difference with respect to defaecation and freezing behaviour between controls and those animals that received a shock. Significant differences in corticosterone levels were also noted between controls and those groups that received a shock. No significant differences were found between the shock groups with regards to the stress parameters measured in our fear conditioning paradigm, indicating that the two shock groups were similarly stressed. Increased significance levels were noted for freezing behaviour as well as a lower standard error of means was found in the highest shock intensity group. We therefore recommend using the higher shock intensity (1.5 mA) as the rats in the higher shock intensity group were more homogeneously fearconditioned and therefore the results should be more reproducible and robust than in the lower shock intensity group. This would allow for fewer rats to be used in order to gain an accurate impression of the conditioning paradigm employed.

    Abstract:

    Many fear conditioning studies use electric shock as the aversive stimulus. The intensity of shocks varies throughout the literature. In this study, shock intensities ranging from 0 to 1.5 mA were used, and the effects on the rats assessed by both behavioural and biochemical stress parameters. Results indicated a significant difference with respect to defaecation and freezing behaviour between controls and those animals that received a shock. Significant differences in corticosterone levels were also noted between controls and those groups that received a shock. No significant differences were found between the shock groups with regards to the stress parameters measured in our fear conditioning paradigm, indicating that the two shock groups were similarly stressed. Increased significance levels were noted for freezing behaviour as well as a lower standard error of means was found in the highest shock intensity group. We therefore recommend using the higher shock intensity (1.5 mA) as the rats in the higher shock intensity group were more homogeneously fearconditioned and therefore the results should be more reproducible and robust than in the lower shock intensity group. This would allow for fewer rats to be used in order to gain an accurate impression of the conditioning paradigm employed.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

Pietersen C Y Bosker F J Postema F den Boer J A. Fear conditioning and shock intensity: the choice between minimizing the stress induced and reducing the number of animals used[J].中国比较医学杂志,2007,(3):176.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭