H5N1 禽流感病毒实验室检测方法灵敏性比较
作者:
作者单位:

1. 解放军总医院第一附属医院,北京 100037; 2. 军事医学科学院微生物流行病研究所,北京 100071

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Sensitivity Comparision of Methods for Detection of H5N1 Influenza Virus
Author:
Affiliation:

1. The First Hospital Affiliated to the Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100037,China;2. Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology,Academy of Military Medical Sciences,Beijing 100071,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比对实验室常用的 H5N1 禽流感病毒检测方法灵敏性。方法 增殖 H5N1 病毒,蚀斑技术定量待检病毒,应用细胞接种、血凝实验、RT-PCR、Real-time RT-PCR 等方法检测稀释的病毒悬液,比较检测的最低滴度。结果 细胞接种、Real-time RT-PCR、RT-PCR 及血凝实验能检测病毒的最低滴度为 10 PFU /mL、10 PFU /mL、103 PFU /mL 及 3. 52 × 105 PFU /mL。结论 几种检测方法比较而言,细 胞 接 种 与 Real-time RT-PCR 检 测 灵 敏 性 最高; 血凝实验用时最短,但灵敏性低,结果需要进一步确认; RT -PCR 用时较较短,检测灵敏性较高。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the sensitivity of methods for detecting H5N1 influenza virus. Methods The H5N1 influenza virus was amplified and quantified by plaque technology. Then the virus was diluted to compare the minimal titer using methods of cell inoculation,hemagglutinin,RT-PCR and Real-time PCR. Results The minimal titer detected using the methods of cell inoculation,hemagglutinin,RT-PCR and Real-time PCR were 10 PFU /mL,10 PFU /mL,103 PFU /mL and 3. 52 × 105 PFU /mL seperately. Conclusions We found that the methods of cell inoculation and real-time RT-PCR were the most sensitive methods; while the hemagglutinin method was timesaving,it showed low sensitivity which need to be identified in future; RT-PCR method was timesaving,in addition,it also showed high sensitivity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

战大伟,李 靖,刘伯华,颜克松,户 义,姜 涛,祝庆余. H5N1 禽流感病毒实验室检测方法灵敏性比较[J].中国比较医学杂志,2011,21(9):33~36+84.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-12-16
  • 出版日期: