Up and Down 法与寇氏法测定破伤风毒素LD50的比较
作者:

Comparison between Up-and-Down Procedure and Karber Test in Determining Tetanus Toxin LD50 in Mice
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的比较研究Up and Down 法与寇氏法测定破伤风毒素LD50值。 方法NIH小鼠皮下注射破伤风毒素,分别使用寇氏法和Up and Down 法计算LD50值。 结果同一破伤风毒素经寇氏法计算得LD50值为4.97ng/Kg体重,Up and Down 法计算LD50值为4.93 ng/Kg体重,95%置信区间为(4.71~5.13)ng/Kg体重。结论应用Up and Down 法可测出与寇氏法相同结果的LD50值,且动物使用数量仅用8只。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of Dixon and Mood up-and-down method and Karber method in determining tetanus toxin LD50 in mice. Methods Tetanus toxin in a dose of 0.5 mL at concentration of 0.9,0.1,0.5,0.0,0.267 or 0.256 ng/mL was subcutaneously injected into NIH mice. The LD50 of tetanus toxin was determined by Dixon and Mood up-and-down procedure and Karber test. ResultsThe LD50 of tetanus toxin was 4.97 ng/kg body weight measured by Karber method, and 4.93 ng/Kg body weight by the up-and-down procedure. Conclusions Both Dixon and Mood up-and-down procedure and Karber test can achieve the same LD50 of tetanus toxin, but the up-and-down procedure is more simple and convenient, and 8 animals are enough for this test.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

潘若文,马力,张勇朝,张鹏飞,董洁,王魁. Up and Down 法与寇氏法测定破伤风毒素LD50的比较[J].中国比较医学杂志,2012,(12):28~30.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭