微核试验的改进
作者:

Experience exchange in vitro micronucleus assay
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 将传统的骨髓采集方法与改良的方法进行比较,明确两种方法在细胞数量、组织污染情况和涂片染色背景的差异,为以后微核试验的应用提供参考。方法 将处死小鼠的胸骨取出,一部分,使用传统的骨髓采集方法,将小鼠的骨髓挤压于含胎牛血清的载玻片上,常规涂片;另一部分,用1 mL注射器抽取胎牛血清100 μL刺入胸骨中,将骨髓冲出,涂环形薄片。结果 两种方法均能达到实验要求,但是改良骨髓采集法,采集的细胞数量更多,组织污染细胞少,制片背景更加清晰。结论 与传统的骨髓采集方法相比较,改良的骨髓采集法更具优势,使微核试验的细胞计数简易。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the conventional marrow collection with new marrow collection, in the number of cell, other tissues pollution and the background of the smear, providing the reference for future micronucleus test. Methods The mice was enthanasia and the sternums were taken. One group, using the conventional method of marrow collection, squeezing the marrow to the slide with fetal bovine serum; the other group, using 1-mL injector extracting fetal bovine serum 100μL, injecting into mice sternums and rushing out the bone marrow for circle smear. Results Two methods can meet the requirement of test, but the new marrow collection can acquire more number of cells, less the tissues pollution and more clear in the background of smear. Conclusions Comparing with the conventional marrow collection, the new method has more superiority to simplify the next cell counting.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马宝良,鲁克庆.微核试验的改进[J].中国比较医学杂志,2016,26(3):86~88.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 最后修改日期:2016-01-13
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-04-01
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭