不同时长睡眠干扰对SD 大鼠步态及认知能力的影响
作者:
作者单位:

(1.湖南中医药大学医学院病理教研室,长沙 410208; 2.郑州大学第三附属医院,郑州 451200; 3.吉首大学,湖南吉首 416000; 4.中国医学科学院北京协和医学院药用植物研究所,北京 100193)

中图分类号:

R-33


Effects of sleep interruption on gait performance and cognitive ability of SD rats
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Pathology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China.2. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 451200. 3. Jishou University,Jishou 416000. 4. Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 研究不同时长睡眠干扰对SD 大鼠步态及认知能力的影响?方法 将64 只SD 大鼠随机分为睡眠干扰2 d?5 d?10 d?15 d 模型组及相应对照组,共8 组,每组8 只?用滚筒法对大鼠进行睡眠干扰后,到达相应时间点时先进行自主活动检测,再用步态分析仪评估睡眠干扰对SD 大鼠步态的影响,最后用水迷宫检测其学习记忆能力?结果 自主活动显示,与相应对照组比较,5 d 模型组总路程?平均速度?运动总时间?边缘区运动时间明显减少( P < 0. 05),静息总时间明显增加( P < 0. 05);10 d 模型组总路程?平均速度减少( P < 0. 05),运动总时间?边缘区运动时间显著减少( P < 0. 01),静息总时间显著增加( P < 0. 01)?步态结果显示,与相应对照组比较,5 d 模型组平均步行周期明显缩短( P < 0. 05);2 d?15 d 模型组步行速度明显下降?双支撑时相-左前-右后明显缩短( P <0. 05),双支撑时相-左后-右前显著缩短?三支撑时相-右后-左后-右前显著增加( P < 0. 01);2 d?5 d?15 d 模型组右后步幅明显缩小( P < 0. 05)?水迷宫结果显示,与相应对照组比较,5 d 模型组定位航行第1 ~ 4 天潜伏期明显增加( P < 0. 05),10 d 模型组定位航行第2?4 天潜伏期明显增加( P < 0. 05),15 d 模型组定位航行第1 ~ 5 天潜伏期明显增加( P < 0. 05),其中5 d 模型组定位航行第1 天潜伏期显著增加( P < 0. 01),15 d 模型组定位航行第1 ~ 3 天潜伏期显著增加( P < 0. 01)?结论 不同时长睡眠干扰对SD 大鼠步态?自主活动?空间定位学习能力有不同程度的影响?步态检测相比自主活动和水迷宫检测,是评价滚筒法睡眠干扰模型更为敏感的方法?

    Abstract:

    Objective To study the effects of sleep interruption (SI) on the gait performance and cognitive ability of SD rats. Methods SD rats were randomly divided into eight groups: SI 2 days, SI 5 days, SI 10 days, SI 15 days, and their corresponding control groups, 8 rats in each group. Behavioral alterations in the gait detection (GD), open field (OF), and Morris water maze (MWM) tests were detected after SI for the indicated time periods. Results For the OF test, the total distance, movement speed, total duration of movement, and movement time in the peripheral area decreased following SI, and the total resting duration increased in the 5-day and 10-day SI groups compared with the control group ( P < 0. 05). The GD result showed that compared with the control group, the stride time decreased in the 5-day SI group; the walking speed, Lh-Rf double support time, and Lf-Rh double support time all decreased in the 2-day and 15-day groups, while the Rh-Lh-Rf three support time increased in the 2-day and 15-day SI groups; and the Rh stride length decreased in the 2-day, 5-day, and 15-day SI groups ( P < 0. 05). For the MWM test, compared with the control group, the latency of place navigation of MWM increased between days 1 and 4 in the 5-day SI group, increased between days 2 and 4 in the 10- day SI group, and increased between days 1 and 5 in the 15-day SI group. Conclusions Different durations of SI have varying effects on the result of the GD, OF, and MWM tests in SD rats. The GD test is a more sensitive method for evaluating the SI model than the OF and MWM tests.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

卜兰兰,金剑,李思迪,刘新民.不同时长睡眠干扰对SD 大鼠步态及认知能力的影响[J].中国比较医学杂志,2019,29(11):65~70.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-12-10
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭