三种麻醉方法在骨科动物实验中效果比较
作者:
基金项目:

[基金项目] 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81228013)


Comparation of three anesthetic methods during orthopedic animal experiments
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【摘要】 目的 比较三种麻醉方法在骨科动物实验中的效果,从而得出最佳方法。 方法 将80只实验动物随机分为三组,A组(速眠新II肌肉注射组),B组(0.6%戊巴比妥钠静脉注射组),C组(速眠新II肌肉注射+0.6%戊巴比妥钠静脉注射联合用药组),在骨科动物实验中分别进行麻醉、手术,比较三组的麻醉效果,观察其诱导期、麻醉期(麻醉维持时间)、苏醒期、麻醉效果、死亡率等。 结果 A组麻醉的诱导期长,效果不好;B组麻醉的诱导期短,但麻醉效果不理想,死亡率高;C组麻醉的诱导期短,麻醉效果好,安全。 结论 C组诱导期短,麻醉效果好,安全。无论在实验动物的伦理道德方面,还是在保证动物实验质量方面都是最佳选择。 【关键词】 速眠新II;戊巴比妥钠;实验动物;麻醉

    Abstract:

    【Abstract】 Objection To determine the optimal anesthetic method, our study compared the effect of three anesthetic methods in orthopedic animal experiments. Methods 80 experimental animals were randomly divided into three groups, group A was given with sumianxin II by intramuscular injection, group B was administrated with 0.6% pentobarbital sodium by intravenous injection, and group C was given with 0.6% pentobarbital sodium by introvenous injection combined with sumianxin II by intramuscular injection. Anesthesia was performed in orthopedic animal experiments surgery. Induction period of anesthesia (maintenance of anesthesia time), the recovery period, the anesthetic effect, mortality rates were observed after anesthesia. Results Anesthesia induction period is long, the effect is not good in group A; anesthesia induction period was short, but the bad effects of anesthesia and the mortality rate was high in group B; however, induction period of group C was short and safety. Conclusion pentobarbital sodium combined with sumianxin II is a good anesthetic method compared with pentobarbital sodium or sumianxin II respectively. Its induction period is short and safety. Therefore, it is an excellent and safe method to anesthetize animal in orthopaedic using Sumianxin II combined with pentobarbital sodium. 【Keywords】 Sumianxin II; pentobarbital sodium;experimental animal;anesthesia

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

梁佩红.三种麻醉方法在骨科动物实验中效果比较[J].中国比较医学杂志,2012,(11).

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-26
  • 最后修改日期:2012-10-22
  • 录用日期:2012-10-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-03-21
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭