两种方法清除大鼠子宫内膜巨噬细胞的比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

南京中医药大学针灸推拿学院养生康复学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R271.9

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(82205251);国家自然科学基金(82274638);江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(23KJA360006)


A comparative study of two methods for the clearance of macrophages from the rat endometrium
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Acupuncture,Moxibustion and Tuina,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 通过比较氯膦酸二钠脂质体不同给药途径的作用差异,探索更有效的大鼠子宫内膜巨噬细胞清除方法。方法 雌性8周龄SD大鼠随机分为单侧对照组(左侧宫腔注射磷酸缓冲盐脂质体100 μL)、单侧清除组(右侧宫腔注射氯膦酸二钠脂质体100 μL)、双侧对照组(双侧宫腔注射磷酸缓冲盐脂质体100 μL)、双侧清除组(双侧宫腔注射氯膦酸二钠脂质体100 μL)、全身对照组(尾静脉注射磷酸缓冲盐脂质体500 μL)、全身清除组(尾静脉注射氯膦酸二钠脂质体500 μL)。注射后48h,获取组织样本。采用HE染色观察子宫、卵巢组织形态结构,免疫组化观察子宫、卵巢组织中巨噬细胞阳性表达,流式细胞术检测子宫、卵巢组织中巨噬细胞数量的变化。结果 各组大鼠子宫、卵巢组织结构与形态并无明显差异。免疫组化法结果显示:与对照组相比,单侧及双侧清除组中子宫巨噬细胞阳性表达明显降低(P<0.001),卵巢巨噬细胞阳性表达无影响(P>0.05),全身清除组子宫和卵巢组织中巨噬细胞阳性表达均减少(P<0.01,P<0.01);与单侧及双侧清除组相比,全身清除对卵巢组织中巨噬细胞阳性表达的影响更大(P<0.05)。流式细胞术检测显示,与对照组相比,各清除组均能有效降低子宫组织中巨噬细胞百分比(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.05),与全身清除组相比,单侧及双侧清除组子宫内膜巨噬细胞清除效果更好(P<0.05,P<0.05);各清除组卵巢组织中巨噬细胞数量与对照组相比均有所下降,其中全身清除组巨噬细胞数目减少最明显(P<0.05),单侧及双侧清除组与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 局部宫腔注射氯膦酸二钠脂质体清除子宫巨噬细胞的方式优于尾静脉注射,并可避免其对卵巢巨噬细胞的影响,是建立理想的子宫局部巨噬细胞清除模型的最佳方法。

    Abstract:

    Objectives A comparison of different administration routes of clodronate disodium liposomes to determine which is the most effective method of rat endometrial macrophage clearance. Methods Female 8-week-old SD rats were randomly divided into the unilateral control group (injected 100μL PBS liposomes into the left uterine cavity), unilateral clearance group (injected 100μL clodronate liposomes into the right uterine cavity), bilateral control group (injected 100 μL PBS liposomes into the bilateral intrauterine), bilateral clearance group (injected 100 μL clodronate liposomes into the bilateral intrauterine), and whole-body control group (injected 500 μL PBS liposomes into the caudal vein ) and whole-body clearance group (injected 500 μL clodronate liposomes into the caudal vein). Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to observe the morphology and structure of uterine and ovarian tissues, immunohistochemistry was used to observe the positive presence of macrophages in uterine and ovarian tissues, and flow cytometry was used to detect changes of the macrophages cell counts in uterine and ovarian tissues. Results There was no significant difference in the structure and morphology of the uterus and ovary among all groups. Immunohistochemical staining showed that compared to the control group, the positive expression of uterine macrophages in unilateral and bilateral clearance groups was significantly decreased (P<0.001), and had no effect on the accumulation of macrophages in the ovary (P>0.05). The numbers of macrophages in both uterine and ovarian tissues decreased of whole-body clearance group (P<0.01, P<0.01). Compared with unilateral and bilateral clearance groups, whole-body clearance group had a greater effect on the positive expression of macrophages in ovarian tissues (P<0.05). Flow cytometry showed that compared with the control group, the percentage of macrophages in the uterine tissue was significantly reduced in each clearance group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.05). Compared to the whole-body clearance group, the clearance effect of endometrial macrophages was better in the unilateral and bilateral clearance groups (P<0.05,P<0.05). In addition, the number of macrophages in ovarian tissue decreased in all clearance groups compared to the control group. The decrease in macrophage number was most pronounced in the whole-body clearance group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the unilateral and bilateral clearance groups compared with the control group (P>0.05).

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-10
  • 最后修改日期:2024-03-15
  • 录用日期:2024-05-16
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
防诈骗提示!请勿点击不明链接或添加个人微信。编辑部所有邮箱后缀均为@cnilas.org
关闭