基于数据挖掘的肝郁大鼠模型构建与应用评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

北京中医药大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

中医养生学教育部重点实验室建设项目


Construction and Application Evaluation of a Rat Model of Liver Depression Based on Data Mining
Author:
Affiliation:

北京中医药大学

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【】目的:探究肝郁证大鼠模型的造模与评价方法,为该模型的规范化发展提供参考依据。方法:通过计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普等数据库中2019年11月14日至2024年11月14日与肝郁证大鼠模型相关的实验类文献,依据设定的纳入和排除标准筛选文献,提取文献中发表时间、动物情况、涉及疾病、造模方法、造模时间、评价指标、干预方式等信息,运用Excel 2021和IBM SPSS Modeler 18.0软件进行数据整理、频次分析、关联规则分析,并以图表形式可视化展示。结果:最终纳入188篇符合标准的文献。肝郁证大鼠模型常用SD大鼠(75.53%),雄性居多(62.77%),多为SPF级(82.45%);涉及疾病以消化系统疾病为主(59.39%);证型中肝郁脾虚证最为常见(62.96%),造模方法多采用多因素法(55.03%),造模时间集中在18-21天。同时得到了潜在宏观证候评价指标组合,干预方式以中药复方(86.42%)为主。结论:肝郁证大鼠模型应用广泛,但目前存在证型名称不规范、造模方法缺乏统一标准、评价体系不完善等问题。本研究为肝郁证大鼠模型证型规范、模型优化及评价体系改进提供了思路和参考。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To explore the methods of establishing and evaluating the rat model of liver depression syndrome, and provide a reference for the standardized development of this model.Methods: Computer searches were conducted in databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP for experimental literature related to the rat model of liver depression syndrome from November 14, 2019, to November 14, 2024. The literature was screened according to the set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Information such as the publication time, animal conditions, related diseases, modeling methods, modeling time, evaluation indicators, and intervention methods in the literature was extracted. Software such as Excel 2021 and IBM SPSS Modeler 18.0 were used for data collation, frequency analysis, association rule analysis, and the results were visually displayed in the form of charts.Results: A total of 188 eligible literatures were finally included. The commonly used rats in the rat model of liver depression syndrome were Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (75.53%), mostly male (62.77%), and most of them were specific pathogen-free (SPF) grade (82.45%). The related diseases were mainly digestive system diseases (59.39%). Among the syndrome types, the liver depression and spleen deficiency syndrome was the most common (62.96%). The multi-factor method was mostly used for the modeling method (55.03%), and the modeling time was concentrated within 18-21 days. At the same time, potential combinations of macroscopic syndrome evaluation indicators were obtained, and the intervention method was mainly Chinese medicine compound prescriptions (86.42%).Conclusion: The rat model of liver depression syndrome is widely used, but currently there are problems such as non-standard names of syndrome types, lack of unified standards for modeling methods, and imperfect evaluation systems. This study provides ideas and references for the standardization of syndrome types, model optimization, and improvement of the evaluation system of the rat model of liver depression.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-30
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-09
  • 录用日期:2025-10-29
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: