兔脑浸液与脂多糖诱导家兔弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)模型在医学实验教学中的比较研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

复旦大学基础医学国家级实验教学示范中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

] 教育部产学合作协同育人项目[NO.220901282154531],教育部基础学科拔尖学生培养计划2.0研究课题[NO.20212025]


A Comparative Investigation into the Rabbit Brain Infusion and Lipopolysaccharide - Induced Diffuse Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) Model in Rabbits for Medical Laboratory Teaching
Author:
Affiliation:

1.National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Basic Medicine,Fudan University,Shanghai,;2.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对比兔脑浸液(TF)与脂多糖(LPS)所诱导的家兔弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)模型于医学实验教学中的应用价值。方法:从致病机制、建模技术、检测体系以及教学应用这四个层面,对上述两种经典模型展开系统性对比,并将研究成果与教学实践相结合。结果:兔脑浸液模型借助外源性凝血激活来模拟急性创伤性 DIC,而 LPS 模型则通过内源性炎症 - 凝血级联反应来复制慢性感染性 DIC,这两种模型在致病时相、指标特征以及实验技能训练侧重点方面相互补充。结论:基于机制导向、技能分层以及临床映射的教学优化策略,能够显著增强学生对 DIC 复杂病理过程的认知与实践能力,为医学实验教学提供全方位的解决途径。

    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To compare the application value of rabbit brain fluid (TF) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) model in medical laboratory teaching. METHODS: The two classical models were systematically compared from four dimensions: pathogenic mechanism, modeling technology, detection system, and teaching application, and the research results and teaching practice were integrated. Results: The rabbit brain fluid model simulates acute traumatic DIC through exogenous coagulation activation, and the LPS model replicates chronic infectious DIC through endogenous inflammation-coagulation cascade, which complement each other in terms of pathogenicity, index characteristics, and experimental skills training. CONCLUSION: The optimization strategy of mechanism-oriented-skill stratification-clinical mapping can significantly improve students" knowledge and practical ability in the complex pathological process of DIC, and provide a three-dimensional solution for medical laboratory teaching.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-08
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-26
  • 录用日期:2025-12-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: