Effects of animal preparation on the microPET imaging in nude mouse tumor xenografts
CSTR:
Author:
  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [16]
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effects of animal preparation on microPET imaging of tumor xenografts in nude mice and optimize the imaging protocol.Methods Thirty-six nude mice implanted with human epidermoid carcinoma A431cells were randomly divided into 6 groups. Group A: no fasting, room temperature (20℃ to 22℃), no anesthesia (leaving the animal awake for 60 min after the 18F-FDG injection), and 18F-FDG given by i.v. injection. Group B: Fasting (6 to 8 h), warming (30℃ to 32℃), anesthesia (inhaling 2% isoflurane anesthesia), and 18F-FDG given by i.v. injection. Group C: No fasting, warming, anesthesia, and 18F-FDG given by i.v. injection. Group D: Fasting, room temperature, anesthesia, and 18F-FDG given by i.v. injection. Group E: Fasting, warming, no anesthesia, and FDG given by i.v. injection. Group F: Fasting, warming, anesthesia, and 18F-FDG was given by i.p. injection. Serum glucose level was measured before FDG injection.%ID/gmax of the subcutaneous tumor, neck muscle, brown adipose tissue, brain, liver, kidney, myocardium, harderian gland of the groups A to F were measured after scanning. Results (1) The tumor 18F-FDG uptake was significantly inversely correlated with glycemia in the groups B, C and F (P<0.05). (2) The 18F-FDG uptakes in the brown adipose and muscle tissues in the group A were 8.03±1.29 and 16.07±5.20, respectively. The 18F-FDG uptakes in the brown adipose and muscle tissues in the group B were decreased by 71.98% and 81.84%, respectively, than that in the group A (P<0.05). The uptake in the cervical muscles was highest in the group A (16.07±5.20), and lowest in the group B, being 81.84% lower than that of the group A (P=0.000). The uptakes by brain, liver, kidney, myocardium and harderian gland were not significantly different among different groups. (3) The tumor-to-organ uptake ratio was lowest in the group A. The tumor-to-muscle, tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-brown fat uptake ratios were 6.5-fold, 1.29-fold and 4.76-fold increased, respectively, in the group B than that in the group A (P<0.05 for all). Under the experimental conditions of group B, the image contrast of tumor and organs was improved. (4) No significant differences were found for tumor 18F-FDG uptake by different routes of injection in the first scanning (P=0.364). After the second scanning, the 18F-FDG accumulation in the abdominal cavity by intraperitoneal injection led to a lower uptake of tumor and normal tissues. Significant differences were found for tumor 18F-FDG uptake by intraperitoneal injection between the first scanning and the second scanning (P=0.025). Conclusions Animal preparation has significant effects on the 18F-FDG biodistribution in normal tissues and the uptake in subcutaneously transplanted tumors. Fasting, warming, anesthesia, intravenous injection can improve the imaging quality and reproducibility.

    Reference
    [1] Cohade C. Altered biodistribution on FDG-PET with emphasis on brown fat and insulin effect[J]. Semin Nucl Med, 2010, 40(4):283-293.
    [2] Boellaard R, O'Doherty MJ, Weber WA, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2010, 37(1):181-200.
    [3] Toyama H, Ichise M, Liow JS, et al. Absolute quantification of regional cerebral glucose utilization in mice by FDG small animal PET scanning and 2-14C-DG autoradiography[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(8):1398-1405.
    [4] Toyama H, Ichise M, Liow JS, et al. Evaluation of anesthesia effects on 18F FDG uptake in mouse brain and heart using small animal PET[J]. Nucl Med Biol, 2004, 31(2):251-256.
    [5] Lapointe D, Brasseur N, Cadorette J, et al. High-resolution PET imaging for in vivo monitoring of tumor response after photodynamic therapy in mice[J]. J Nucl Med, 1999, 40(5):876-882.
    [6] Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al.[18F] FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: does[18F] FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction?[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2003, 30(5):682-688.
    [7] Kelloff GJ, Hoffman JM, Johnson B, et al. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11(8):2785-2808.
    [8] Molthoff CFM, Klabbers BM, Berkhof J, et al. Monitoring response to radiotherapy in human squamous cell cancer bearing nude mice: comparison of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18 F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) and 3'-[18 F] fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine (FLT)[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2007, 9(6):340-347.
    [9] Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I, et al. Impact of animal handling on the results of FDG PET studies in mice[J]. J Nucl Med, 2006, 47(6):999-1006.
    [10] Aliaga A, Rousseau JA, Cadorette J, et al. A small animal positron emission tomography study of the effect of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy on the uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18] fluoro-D-glucose in murine models of breast cancer[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2007, 9(3):144-150.
    [11] Roy FN, Beaulieu S, Boucher L, et al. Impact of intravenous insulin on FDG PET in diabetic cancer patients[J]. J Nucl Med, 2009,50(2):178-183.
    [12] Hany TF, Gharehpapagh E, Kamel EM, et al. Brown adipose tissue: a factor to consider in symmetrical tracer uptake in the neck and upper chest region[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2002, 29(10):1393-1398.
    [13] Saito M, Okamatsu-Ogura Y, Matsushita M, et al. High incidence of metabolically active brown adipose tissue in healthy adult humans[J]. Diabetes, 2009, 58(7):1526-1531.
    [14] Lee KH, Ko BH, Paik JY, et al. Effects of anesthetic agents and fasting duration on FDG biodistribution and insulin levels in tumor-bearing mice[J]. J Nucl Med, 2005, 46(9):1531-1536.
    [15] Yeung HWD, Grewal RK, Gonen M, et al. Patterns of FDG uptake in adipose tissue and muscle: a potential source of false-positives for PET[J]. J Nucl Med, 2003, 44(11): 1789-1796.
    [16] Woo SK, Lee TS, Kim KM, et al. Anesthesia condition for FDG imaging of lung metastasis tumors using small animal PET[J]. Nucl Med Biol, 2008, 35(1):143-150.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Revised:December 05,2013
  • Online: February 28,2014
Article QR Code