Comparative analysis of adipose-derived stem cells from commonly used laboratory animals and human
CSTR:
Author:
  • LI Keya

    LI Keya

    Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS);Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC); Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Human Disease Animal Models, State Administration of Traditional Chineses Medicine, Beijing 100021, China
    Find this author on All Journals
    Find this author on BaiDu
    Search for this author on this site
Affiliation:

(Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS);Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC); Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Human Disease Animal Models, State Administration of Traditional Chineses Medicine, Beijing 100021, China)

Clc Number:

R-33

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective To provide experimental data for preclinical studies on the treatment of human diseases byautologous fat stem cell transplantation, including isolation and culture methods and the biological characteristics oflaboratory animals including C57 mice, SD rats, and cynomolgus monkey adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), which werecompared with those of humans. Methods hADSCs, mouse adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (mADSCs), ratadipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (rADSCs) and cynomolgus monkey adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells(cADSCs) were identified via surface markers using flow cytometry, and adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation wasinduced. Results All the hADSCs, mADSCs, rADSCs and cADSCs showed fibroblast-like morphology. Flow cytometryshowed that mesenchymal stem cell surface markers CD90 and CD29 in ADSCs of each species were positive, while thevascular endothelial cell marker CD31 was negative. Oil red O and alizarin red staining showed that hADSCs, mADSCs,rADSCs and cADSCs differentiated into fat cells and bone cells. Conclusions Laboratory animal ADSCs and hADSCs canbe cultured using the same method and they all had similar surface marker expression, as well as adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential, indicating their usefulness for the pre-clinical study of autologous ADSC transplantation.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 28,2019
  • Online: July 16,2019
Article QR Code